delcypher added a comment. @rjmccall
>> Sorry if these are silly questions and if I've misunderstood something, I >> saw n1863 say "functions return unqualified types" and I was very surprised. > > Just to be clear, you understand that this is only about top-level qualifiers > on the return type, right? `const void *foo();` is still meaningful, it's > just that `const void * const foo();` isn't. Oh that wasn't obvious to me at all. I had assumed "unqualified types" means remove qualifiers from everywhere in the type, not just the top level. Presumably something was meant to imply that? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D125919/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D125919 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
