rjmccall added a comment. Ah, true, the standard doesn't describe it as a normal qualifier. From the DR, it sounds like the committee certainly expected that this reasoning would also apply to `_Atomic`, even if that's not quite what they've written, but that the DR submitter seems to not want that behavior. Have you been able to track down the solicited paper mentioned in that DR? In the absence of further indication, I think dropping `_Atomic` like anything else is the right thing to do; like the other qualifiers, it isn't meaningful for r-values.
Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D125919/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D125919 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
