rampitec added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/test/CodeGenCUDA/fp-atomics-optremarks.cu:10 + +// GFX90A-CAS: A compare and swap loop was generated for an atomic operation at system memory scope +// GFX90A-CAS-LABEL: _Z14atomic_add_casPf ---------------- gandhi21299 wrote: > rampitec wrote: > > gandhi21299 wrote: > > > rampitec wrote: > > > > Need tests for all scopes. > > > `__atomic_fetch_add` does not take scope as an argument, how could I add > > > tests with different scopes? > > At least in the IR test. > What do you mean by that? You need to test all of that. If you cannot write a proper .cu test, then write an IR test and run llc. ================ Comment at: llvm/lib/CodeGen/AtomicExpandPass.cpp:618 expandAtomicRMWToCmpXchg(AI, createCmpXchgInstFun); + Ctx.getSyncScopeNames(SSNs); + auto MemScope = SSNs[AI->getSyncScopeID()].empty() ---------------- gandhi21299 wrote: > rampitec wrote: > > Only if SSNs.empty(). > Sorry, what do you mean? SSN will be empty at that point. I thought want to cache it. But really just declare it here. ================ Comment at: llvm/lib/CodeGen/AtomicExpandPass.cpp:624 + Remark << "A compare and swap loop was generated for an " + << AI->getOpcodeName() << "operation at " << MemScope + << " memory scope"; ---------------- gandhi21299 wrote: > rampitec wrote: > > I believe getOpcodeName() will return "atomicrmw" instead of the operation. > > Also missing space after it. > getOpcodeName() returns `atomicrmwoperation`, as per the tests the spacing > looks correct to me. The operation to report is AI->getOperation(). Spacing is wrong, "operation" is your text. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D106891/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D106891 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits