NoQ added a comment.

No, that's the wrong destructor. We don't want to invalidate the smart pointer; 
we've already modeled it precisely. What i meant was construct a new 
`CallEvent` (through `CallEventManager`) for the destructor of the //pointee// 
and use that.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D105821/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D105821

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to