MarcusJohnson91 added a comment. In D103426#2807860 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D103426#2807860>, @aaron.ballman wrote:
> In D103426#2807245 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D103426#2807245>, > @MarcusJohnson91 wrote: > >> In D103426#2806391 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D103426#2806391>, >> @aaron.ballman wrote: >> >>> Do you have a reference to the WG14 paper proposing these conversion >>> specifiers? >> >> I've previously written up the proposal, which you actually helped with >> (thank you for that), just submitted a request to Dan Plakosh to get a >> document number and submit it. > > Thanks! Once it's submitted and available on the committee webpage, can you > post a link to it in this review? That'd help assess whether the > implementation matches the proposal or not. Absolutely :) >> Maybe I was a bit optimistic, but I don't think l16 and l32 will be a hard >> sell, but maybe I'm naive haha > > There's never a shortage of surprises when it comes to standardization > efforts. :-D lol, well I'm hopeful it'll be smooth sailing Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D103426/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D103426 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
