aaron.ballman added a comment. In D103426#2807245 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D103426#2807245>, @MarcusJohnson91 wrote:
> In D103426#2806391 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D103426#2806391>, @aaron.ballman > wrote: > >> Do you have a reference to the WG14 paper proposing these conversion >> specifiers? > > I've previously written up the proposal, which you actually helped with > (thank you for that), just submitted a request to Dan Plakosh to get a > document number and submit it. Thanks! Once it's submitted and available on the committee webpage, can you post a link to it in this review? That'd help assess whether the implementation matches the proposal or not. > Maybe I was a bit optimistic, but I don't think l16 and l32 will be a hard > sell, but maybe I'm naive haha There's never a shortage of surprises when it comes to standardization efforts. :-D Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D103426/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D103426 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
