xiangzhangllvm added a comment.
In D98757#2631042 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D98757#2631042>, @lebedev.ri wrote:
> The ongoing special-casing of `X86_AMXTy` through the llvm due to the
> inability of the existing backend passes to handle certain llvm ir constructs.
We have bring up it to llvm-dev.
BTW,** All the Type should see as target independent.** (Even it support by
less targets or 1 target)
Current we see “ if (Ty.isVectorTy()) {…}” is make sense in Mid-End.
Why we can’t see “if (Ty.isX86_AMXTy()){…}” is make sense ?
**Just because more targets support the VectorTy, less target (only x86)
support the AMXTy ?
The logic is not make sense.**
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D98757/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D98757
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
