xiangzhangllvm added a comment. In D98757#2630942 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D98757#2630942>, @lebedev.ri wrote:
> I strongly suggest you bring up this ongoing creep of `if > (DestTy->isX86_AMXTy()) return false;` on llvm-dev. > I strongly supsect you are covering up bugs in you backend/pass with them. Sorry, I don't much understand your idea, I happen to find this bug when I supporting fast reg allocation for AMX. It fold the Constant bitcast of tile type into a amx instruction, which will escape the BackEnd pass "Lower AMX type for Load/Store" Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D98757/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D98757 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
