lebedev.ri added a comment. In D98757#2631036 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D98757#2631036>, @xiangzhangllvm wrote:
> In D98757#2631019 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D98757#2631019>, @lebedev.ri > wrote: > >> Once again, i suggest to bring this up on llvm-dev. > > That is obvious, > Discuss what, can you point it out clearly ? The ongoing special-casing of `X86_AMXTy` through the llvm due to the inability of the existing backend passes to handle certain llvm ir constructs. > The topic is do it in mid-end or back-end ? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D98757/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D98757 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
