pdhaliwal added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/lib/Driver/Driver.cpp:755
+ *this, TT, *HostTC, C.getInputArgs(),
Action::OFK_OpenMP);
+ else if (TT.isAMDGCN())
+ DeviceTC =
----------------
JonChesterfield wrote:
> Minor suggestion,
> ```
> if (TT.isNVPTX() {
> ...
> } else {
> assert(TT.isAMDGCN());
> ...
> }```
>
> ? Semantically equivalent, but `if () else if ()` looks like there is a
> missing else clause.
I think, having assert in last else is bit cleaner. What do you think?
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D94961/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D94961
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
