gtbercea marked an inline comment as done.
gtbercea added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lib/CodeGen/CGOpenMPRuntime.cpp:5122
+ NewTask = CGF.EmitRuntimeCall(
+ createRuntimeFunction(OMPRTL__kmpc_omp_target_task_alloc), AllocArgs);
+ } else {
----------------
ABataev wrote:
> gtbercea wrote:
> > ABataev wrote:
> > > gtbercea wrote:
> > > > ABataev wrote:
> > > > > Can we use the same function in both modes, with nowait clause and
> > > > > without?
> > > > For nowait we need to use the target_task_alloc variant. There are
> > > > runtimes - other than the open source one - for which this function
> > > > does something different.
> > > Trunk relies only to libomptarget interfaces. Why we should take into
> > > account some other runtime libraries? Plus, what's so different for async
> > > and non-async versions of the directive?
> > Async is not yet fully supported in the OpenMP open source runtime but at
> > some point it will be. This is the first step towards its support. I'm not
> > sure what your objection is. The difference is clear. Device ID must be
> > passed on the async version of this call.
> The difference is not obvious. Why we can't use the same function for sync
> directives? The fact the it has DeviceId parameter is not an argument here.
> What's so special from functional point of view?
When you have multiple device on the same system you have to be able to
distinguish between then and manage dependencies across these different
devices. Knowing the device is a crucial first step in handling these
inter-device dependencies.
Repository:
rC Clang
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D63009/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D63009
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
