NoQ added a comment.

In D56632#1359215 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D56632#1359215>, @NoQ wrote:

> In D56632#1356163 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D56632#1356163>, 
> @baloghadamsoftware wrote:
>
> > Did you measure decrease in the false-positive rate or an increase in the 
> > true-positive rate on real code? I expect some.
>
>
> In progress :)


Moderately surprisingly, i found no changes at all. I guess it's pretty rare 
that the object dies out from Environment last in such manner while its 
original field symbol values are still important. Still worth fixing though - 
might have been worse, you never know... also peace of mind.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D56632/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D56632



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to