rsmith added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D52339#1249457, @aaron.ballman wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D52339#1249432, @erik.pilkington wrote: > > > Ping! This doesn't really affect CUDA or OpenCL more than any change to the > > compiler, so I don't think it makes sense to block this until we hear from > > them. > > > It impacts them insomuch as they're standards and they may want to opt out of > extensions for keeping code portable to other compilers. My view is that that's what `-pedantic` / `-pedantic-errors` are for. We want Clang to have a consistent user experience across languages, so if we're supporting fixed underlying types as an official Clang extension in languages that don't have it as a feature, that should apply everywhere it makes sense. Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D52339 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
