aaron.ballman added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D52339#1242118, @jfb wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D52339#1242103, @aaron.ballman wrote: > > > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D52339#1242086, @jfb wrote: > > > > > I think we should consider proposing this to the C committee. > > > @aaron.ballman I can help Erik write the paper, would you be able to > > > present it? Too tight for the upcoming meeting, but I'm guessing we have > > > *plenty* of time for ++C17. > > > > > > It's already been proposed to WG14 and is currently on the SD-3 list of > > features to consider for C2x. See > > http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2008.pdf. I know Clive and > > am happy to point him towards this patch (when it lands) as demonstration > > of industry desire for the feature, in case he needs to provide updated > > papers. > > > Wonderful! Does this match he proposed C2x semantics? Once voted in we'll > want to change this from just an extension to also be a `-std=c2x` thing, > better have them match now. I have to validate that still, but from a quick look, I think we're in the ballpark if not outright compatible. Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D52339 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
