jfb added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D52339#1242103, @aaron.ballman wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D52339#1242086, @jfb wrote: > > > I think we should consider proposing this to the C committee. > > @aaron.ballman I can help Erik write the paper, would you be able to > > present it? Too tight for the upcoming meeting, but I'm guessing we have > > *plenty* of time for ++C17. > > > It's already been proposed to WG14 and is currently on the SD-3 list of > features to consider for C2x. See > http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2008.pdf. I know Clive and > am happy to point him towards this patch (when it lands) as demonstration of > industry desire for the feature, in case he needs to provide updated papers. Wonderful! Does this match he proposed C2x semantics? Once voted in we'll want to change this from just an extension to also be a `-std=c2x` thing, better have them match now. Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D52339 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
