honggyu.kim added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D12906#250237, @zaks.anna wrote:
> I agree with Gabor and do not think we should have 2 entries in the plist > file for bug identification. This is confusing and I do not see a need for > this. > > Any comparison script can check for 2 fields in a plist file and concatenate > them. We've already discussed this during the patch review for the other > patch. For example, the latest version does not include the file name. I didn't put 2 entries in plist, I made issue_hash as it was while adding bugid to html report only. So this patch makes issue_hash based on Babati's patch after removing redundent fields. And it also makes BugID that contains all the information so that it doesn't require post processing. BugId is for HTML report comparison. issue_hash is a subset of BugId and CmpRuns.py script will collect more fields with issue_hash so that it contains all information just like BugId here. Thanks. http://reviews.llvm.org/D12906 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
