On 18 February 2013 23:31, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau <kosse...@kde.org> wrote: > Am Montag, 18. Februar 2013, 10:17:35 schrieb Jaroslaw Staniek: >> Hi Friedrich, thanks for the effort and explanation. >> >> Regarding the naming only: I think TINY is useful in general. It would >> be a starting point to alternative GUIs and apps that are not in the >> Active family but are have in certain aspects minimal or stipped-down >> functionality. So I'd like to effectively see general name (such as >> TINY) kept as it is. > > What are you thinking exactly of? And we still could add that once those > alternative GUIs and apps pop up, no? > > This sounds like preparing for hypothetical use cases, without concrete > examples (and thus defined needs). But there are schools which teach to better > avoid that, as it only adds unneeded complexity and will usually not be > fitting stuff that actually pops up. And life showed at least me those schools > are based on heuristics ;)
Well, KEXI_ONLY and KEXI_MOBILE is not hypothetical, we want to have that targets too, e.g. for Windows and/or BB10/Android builds. I don't know how to split the build targets now but the need is pretty clear to me. -- regards / pozdrawiam, Jaroslaw Staniek Kexi & Calligra & KDE | http://calligra.org/kexi | http://kde.org Qt Certified Specialist | http://qt-project.org http://www.linkedin.com/in/jstaniek _______________________________________________ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
