Am Montag, 18. Februar 2013, 10:48:42 schrieb Boudewijn Rempt: > On Sunday 17 February 2013 Feb, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: > > Currently CalligraActive is only built in TINY build set. > > That sounds wrong to me. I think we need > > a) Full build: build everything that can be built > b) Active build: build only the things needed for Active > c) Creative build: build only krita and karbon.
What about the current default, d) Desktop build: build everything but Active stuff Because Calligra Active targets especially the PlasmaActive environment, and thus is not really useful in normal enviroments, so I would expect some people to want an ActiveOnlyInverted or LegacDesktopOnly :) But then the same question needs to be applied, who would need that? Until someone says "me", we could just ignore it. > > TINY also limits the > > filters which are installed. What is the purpose of TINY? Who is known to > > use TINY? Could it perhaps be removed, or rather changed to ACTIVEONLY? > As inge explained, tiny is a historical artefact, it dates back to the > FreOffice/Calligra mobile days. > > One thing that also seems strange to me is that the executables are also > > done in the parts/ subdirs for most programs. What about splitting that > > out into a sibling app/ subdir? Would help with structure > > I wouldn't mind that. It's currently not consisten in any case across all > applications. For instance, krita doesn't have a part directory, and the > part and the exe are in the toplevel krita directory. > Mind -- I think we > need to get rid of KParts and KoParts completely, but that's something I'm > investigating and want to discuss at the sprint. Right, I only wanted to help slightly with the current things. > > And I would also ask to move Author out of its ambush and give it a full > > real toplevel dir, to reduce the complexity in dir layout. Or is there > > any real need to have it there? Now it even has an icon ;), no need to be > > shy and hide. And time for an own SHOULD_BUILD_AUTHOR. > > I'd wait with that until we can do a real refactoring... The way author and > words are mixed up is really ugly, but I don't see how it can be easily > fixed. I will have a look, but given the replies I might not move Author stuff around then and instead just increase complexity of the build instructions as needed in words/ ;) >From the current feedback I will cook up a review request, so we have something to push into shape, but still await more comments in the meantime. Cheers Friedrich _______________________________________________ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
