Hi Friedrich, thanks for the effort and explanation. Regarding the naming only: I think TINY is useful in general. It would be a starting point to alternative GUIs and apps that are not in the Active family but are have in certain aspects minimal or stipped-down functionality. So I'd like to effectively see general name (such as TINY) kept as it is.
-- regards / pozdrawiam, Jaroslaw Staniek Kexi & Calligra & KDE | http://calligra.org/kexi | http://kde.org Qt Certified Specialist | http://qt-project.org http://www.linkedin.com/in/jstaniek _______________________________________________ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
