On Thu, 22 Dec 2011 13:33:19 +0100, Inge Wallin <i...@lysator.liu.se>
wrote:
On Thursday, December 22, 2011 12:51:12 Adam C. wrote:
to me the design looks a little bit like hastily cobbled together. the
elements are not aligned, there is no contrast and the different font
types are fighting each other. there are to many elements, especially
for
navigation (the apps, the top right menu, device selector and the
monitor).
of course also i am not a designer, but we had some lessons in
university
on this topic, so i tried to quickly stick something together.
http://wstaw.org/m/2011/12/22/calligrahp__.png
this is far from perfect, it could use some more contrast, the fonts
should be consistent, and the bottom news area is lifeless (could use
some
graphics there).
It does look good, but there is a fundamental problem with it. The
original
design was done so that you can get a quick overview of what Calligra
has to
deliver (desktop/tablet/phone/engine) and when you click on any of them
you
would get a summary of each part. That is gone in your version.
The area with the stage screenshot is meant to be a slideshow. we could
show an overview of the category (eg desktop, mobile etc) on the first
slide.
if somebody wants to know, which apps there are, he would probably head to
the 'All apps' or 'What is calligra' menu item (which should be the same
font as all apps in this design btw).
this message is intended to be constructive, please don't feel offended
or
something.
I think we can take a constructive discussion about the website. :)
_______________________________________________
calligra-devel mailing list
calligra-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
_______________________________________________
calligra-devel mailing list
calligra-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
