Kinsey Moore commented on a discussion: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/230#note_112702 Regardless of the intent, the generically named BSP was created as an exact clone of the other BSP and still exists in that state (this patch set not withstanding). Neither reference lockstep at all. If it's going to be intended for lockstep usage, that should be clear since I've been using it in split mode. As you said, naming here is still fluid since none of this has been released, yet. I'd be happy with the mercuryxu5 BSP going away in favor of these configurations you're adding, but I can take care of that later if you don't want to add it to this patch set. -- View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/230#note_112702 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org.
_______________________________________________ bugs mailing list bugs@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/bugs
