"Alfred M\. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If the decision is that the code in gnumach-1-branch is what we > should care most about using and releasing, and that this is the > code which should be the basis of ongoing development, then it is, > de facto, HEAD. Which is what you said. > > Right. And if the decision is that, then the bug-fix-only rule _is_ > lifted for the code in gnumach-1-branch.
The "code in the gnumach-1-branch" is nearly identical to the "code in the HEAD branch". What distinguishes them is the labels we put on them, and small differences in the code. > I don't see the whole fuss about adding features to gnumach-1-branch, > oskit-branch got features added while gnumach-1-branch was HEAD. Perhaps you don't understand what the branch was created for. Maybe you should ask before launching off and declaring how the world should be rearranged. > The only really good reason for swapping branches is that the code > in right now HEAD is b0rked, not that gnumach-1-branch is the most > cared about. So fix the code in HEAD. _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
