"Alfred M\. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > So there's only one feasible solution; open a new branch for GNU > > Mach and GNU Hurd, and allow the people _who still want to work > > on Mach/Hurd_ do their own way. > > I was under the impression we already have such a branch which ams > uses. > > Only in the hurd module, and no, I don't want a ams-branch thingy in > gnumach.
Well, it sounds like Sergio Lopez would like one; is that correct? _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
