> > So there is no reason not to revert the `bug fixes only' > > rule for gnumach-1-branch, if there is a tier one who checks > > patches. > > Incorrect; if your reasoning is right (and I want to hear from > others too) then the thing to do is to swap the HEAD > designation. > > By swapping gnumach-1-branch to HEAD, you are essentially > reverting the bug-fix-only rule anyway, kinda. Work would still > be done on the code base that is gnumach-1-branch, but not on > that branch.
I think you don't understand. Maybe you could instead of assuming that I understand something, explain why you think I don't understand something. _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
