"Alfred M\. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Marcus, I'm not even sure how to talk to you. Just remove that > > idiotic tag at once (unless I did it right). You have no > > business calling what I am doing illegal, by force or sudden. > > What did Marcus tag? > > The GNU Mach tree. > > Marcus, can you find a name for the tag which is less provocative? > > Why is there a need for a tag at all? It isn't like the patches are > earth shaking, make huge changes or are untested.
I can't make sense of what you're saying. You said to me that you hadn't committed anything; so what revisions have been tagged? Anyone can create a tag which will help them keep track of the source code, for whatever purpose they wish. There, I've made an Executive Decision. That said, I do think that Marcus should choose a name which you do not find hurtful. Thomas _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
