"Alfred M\. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > It isn't acceptable for calling my I was trying to do for a > > hostile, illegal, and a takover by force. I gave enough of a > > warning to people, you could have said `no', and I would have > > held of, that is not force. If this `takeover' was done by > > force, then I would have commited the patches already, I haven't > > since someone, Marcus of all people, voiced their voice. > > Marcus already asked you not to commit those patches. I saw the > request on the list. > > And look: no patches commited. Marcus still has no right calling it a > putch.
So what exactly are you complaining about? Can we please tone things down a bit? _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
