On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 11:47:27PM +0100, Moritz Schulte wrote: > The point I try to make is that it's imho better to let the user > decide what should happen in such a situation and give him at least > the chance to get control over the situation back.
That is because you use your system interactively. But there might be no user around to do anything, or the system might be in a state where no action can be contributed by the user (because everything that could get user input has just broken down). Of course, we really have to look at the specific case, there is probably no blanket statement for such things. All errors that can be recovered from should of course not cause instant server death. Thanks, Marcus -- `Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' Debian http://www.debian.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] Marcus Brinkmann GNU http://www.gnu.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.marcus-brinkmann.de _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
