Jon Arney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It is not inherently better than syslogd. It does, however, > serve a slightly different class of process.
We don't really want to have "different classes" of processes unless there's a real need. > The second point is that many of the hurd translators do not use > syslog (perhaps out of concern for the issues I raise above). > In fact, the only ones in the source base I could see were: > > daemons/getty.c, > daemons/lmail.c, > trans/pump.c > ufs-utils/newfs.c Right, that's why there's a task list item relating to it. _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
