On Wed, 11 May 2022 at 18:25, Paul Eggert <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Sorry, I should have been more specific. In glibc regex, \s is a synonym
> for [[:space:]] and \S is a synonym for [^[:space:]], so the discussion
> in regex.texi of @samp{\s@var{class}} etc. is wrong on a syntactic level
> not just a semantic level.
>
Sorry, I don't follow. The concrete example given is: \Sw matches any
character that is
not word-constituent. That seems to be [^[:alnum:]]?
--
https://rrt.sc3d.org
