On Wed, 11 May 2022 at 02:01, Paul Eggert <egg...@cs.ucla.edu> wrote:
> > > Failing that, you could also try GNU Emacs's regex implementation, which > >> is derived from GNU regex 0.12, and which may have fewer bugs than regex > >> 0.12. > > > > > > That's a good suggestion I hadn't thought of, thanks. I had a look at > Emacs > > git, and it seems to use glibc regex, though? > > It has two copies of the regex code, one from Gnulib (which is what you > probably saw) and one just for Emacs. I meant the latter. It's in > emacs/src/regex-emacs.[ch]. > Aha! Thanks again. -- https://rrt.sc3d.org