On Wed, 11 May 2022 at 12:18, Bruno Haible <br...@clisp.org> wrote:

> Reuben Thomas wrote:
> > > I'm happy to prepare a patch in this case. I would simply remove all
> > > mention of syntax tables, as that functionality is no longer available.
> >
> > Attached.
>
> Thanks! Looks good to me, except that the comma in line 111 is superfluous.
>

Good spot, that's a remnant of a longer list that did need a comma.

-- 
https://rrt.sc3d.org

Reply via email to