Re: A new module: bitset

[Akim Demaille]

> Le 27 nov. 2018 à 21:31, Paul Eggert <egg...@cs.ucla.edu> a écrit :
> 
> On 11/26/18 8:15 PM, Akim Demaille wrote:
>> The current implementation uses xmalloc, but there are also calls to calloc 
>> and realloc.
> 
> How can it be right to combine xmalloc with calloc/realloc?

I agree.

> Shouldn't the implementation use xmalloc, xcalloc, and xrealloc for 
> consistency? Also, what about applications that don't want to use the x* 
> variants?

What do you propose?