> Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 21:00:16 +0100 > Cc: egg...@cs.ucla.edu, bug-gnulib@gnu.org, j...@meyering.net, > emacs-de...@gnu.org, monn...@iro.umontreal.ca, > roucaries.bast...@gmail.com > From: Ulrich Mueller <u...@gentoo.org> > > >>>>> On Tue, 25 Jan 2011, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > >> > Reality check: there were many changes made in CEDET due to admission > >> > into the Emacs distribution. File-name changes were only a small part > >> > of them, and the changes just moved some files into subdirectories, > >> > such that foo-bar.el became foo/bar.el. > >> > >> Which still breaks compatibility, because (require 'foo-bar) in any > >> elisp package will fail now. > > > And that was the single backward-incompatible change in CEDET? > > No, but your original statement was: "The costs are generally mine, > and mine alone."
The word "generally" is there for a reason.
