> From: Jim Meyering <j...@meyering.net>
> Cc: sdl....@gmail.com,  roucaries.bast...@gmail.com,  egg...@cs.ucla.edu,  
> bug-gnulib@gnu.org,  monn...@iro.umontreal.ca,  emacs-de...@gnu.org
> Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 14:09:39 +0100
> 
> Taking well-intended technical suggestions as a personal attack

It cannot be anything else, when "technical suggestions" boil down to
making the job of a fellow developer 1000 times harder for no good
technical reasons, just because of "oh no, not that again" kind of
irrationalities.  The attack could be unintended, but any reasonable
grown-up will realize that this is the result.

> We are talking about process restrictions that you want to continue
> to impose on the code of all developers

The restrictions are minuscule.  In my latest suggestion, rename only
3 *.m4 files, in a way that still keeps descriptive names.  I wonder
how much time will be wasted on bykeshedding that one.

> We're trying to minimize or eliminate your burden, but you seem
> unwilling to consider the slightest change.

I suggested a compromise solution a few hours ago, which does, I hope,
constitute a change, but have yet to see any response.

Reply via email to