Le mercredi 26 janvier 2011 12:52:33, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit : > Le mercredi 26 janvier 2011 12:02:47, Jim Meyering a écrit : > > Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > >> From: Bastien ROUCARIES <roucaries.bast...@gmail.com> > > >> Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 23:37:08 +0100 > > >> > > >> (if and only if doslfn is buggy, and it does not seems according to > > >> a quick search). > > > > > > Your search was too quick. > > > > Considering your wish to continue supporting emacs on DOS, > > I would have thought you would jump at a possible solution like this. > > If it works (and indications are that it does), then it defines > > away the whole problem. > > Know bug list is pretty short note > > > Wouldn't you welcome the idea of a DOS > > port with no risk of 8.3 collisions? > > > > What if the solution really is as easy as it appears? Here is a > > > > recently-updated FAQ: > > http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~heha/hs_freeware/what_lfn.htm.en > > > > Please give it an honest try before dismissing it. > > > > Just because someone wrote about a problem does not > > mean using it to build Emacs will trigger the same one. > > And even if it does, report it nicely and someone might > > even fix it right away. > > Moreover freedos seems to use routinly doslfn. So it is a least a little > bit tested. and used by 4dos one of the most usuable dos file manager http://4dos.isgreat.org
Bastien
