Bruno Haible wrote: > Pádraig Brady wrote: >>> + /* Compare S1 and S2, ignoring normalization. >> "ignoring normalization" is confusing. > > Is it more understandable if I say "Compare S1 and S2, ignoring differences > in normalization"?
better, thanks. > >> I presume you mean "Compare normalized versions of S1 and S2". > > That's what it does in the implementation, sure. But the wording should be > more abstract. > >>> + NF must be either UNINORM_NFD or UNINORM_NFKD. >> Does it have a functional difference to the result which the >> user chooses. > > Yes, sure. If nf == UNINORM_NFD, differences in canonical composition/ > decomposition are ignored. If nf == UNINORM_NFKD, compatibility equivalences > are also considered. Oops I read NFKD as NFC :p cheers, Pádraig.
