Pádraig Brady wrote: > > + /* Compare S1 and S2, ignoring normalization. > > "ignoring normalization" is confusing.
Is it more understandable if I say "Compare S1 and S2, ignoring differences in normalization"? > I presume you mean "Compare normalized versions of S1 and S2". That's what it does in the implementation, sure. But the wording should be more abstract. > > + NF must be either UNINORM_NFD or UNINORM_NFKD. > > Does it have a functional difference to the result which the > user chooses. Yes, sure. If nf == UNINORM_NFD, differences in canonical composition/ decomposition are ignored. If nf == UNINORM_NFKD, compatibility equivalences are also considered. Bruno
