I submitted a patch for glibc that, if installed, I believe would
allow us to sync with their md5 implementation. It include several
cleanups, some not already in gnulib (e.g., use of uint32_t instead of
md5_uint32). So I installed the below meanwhile.
FSF hasn't answered about the sha1 module... because I'd like to get
rid of the sha1 module's dependency on the md5 module, I could rewrite
the sha1 module (based on the md5 module, and widely available sha1
descriptions) and release it under LGPL. Any objections to that
approach? I'll post a patch first.
2005-10-08 Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* srclist.txt: Bug 1423 is closed, but 1439 remains.
--- srclist.txt 05 Oct 2005 15:54:42 +0200 1.107
+++ srclist.txt 08 Oct 2005 13:04:21 +0200
@@ -186,10 +186,10 @@
$LIBCSRC/time/mktime.c lib gpl
#
-# These are close, but ...
+# http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1439
#$LIBCSRC/crypt/md5.c lib gpl
-# http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1423
#$LIBCSRC/crypt/md5.h lib gpl
+# These are close, but ...
#$LIBCSRC/locale/programs/xmalloc.c lib gpl
#$LIBCSRC/locale/programs/xstrdup.c lib gpl
#$LIBCSRC/malloc/obstack.c lib gpl
_______________________________________________
bug-gnulib mailing list
bug-gnulib@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnulib
