Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Let's not wait for glibc to install my patch... What do you think > about installing the following in gnulib now? It would sync gnulib > with my proposed libc-patch. It also fixes the sha1 module to be > standalone.
I like it. Thanks for the clean-up. I suppose you've done at least a little portability testing? A quick glance through the diffs showed only one nit: > - IMPORTANT: On some systems it is required that RESBUF be correctly > + IMPORTANT: On some systems it is required that RESBUF is correctly > aligned for a 32 bits value. */ Please don't make that change. Using `be' there is actually correct, but the sentence should be changed. How about this instead? IMPORTANT: On some systems, RESBUF must be aligned to a 32-bit boundary. _______________________________________________ bug-gnulib mailing list bug-gnulib@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnulib
