https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33429
--- Comment #10 from Joseph Myers <jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org> --- No, just resolve the relocations by writing 0 in the relocated bits in the case of an undefined weak symbol. Even for TLS models with dynamic relocation, there is no consistency within or between architectures in how references to undefined weak symbols are handled (I abandoned an attempt some years ago to add tests for undefined weak TLS symbol handling to glibc after discovering the lack of consistency). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
