https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33429
--- Comment #8 from Joseph Myers <jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Created attachment 16340 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16340&action=edit TLS ABI The ABI (attached) expects -mxtls to be used for LD and LE TLS access with a TLS area too large for 16-bit offsets. My understanding is that the issue here isn't actually a large TLS area, but undefined weak TLS symbols, for which the ABI says nothing about how they are resolved. Since it says nothing, it would seem appropriate for the linker to handle them (for affected TLS models) in a way that avoids overflow (resolving relocations to an offset of 0, or something like that). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
