https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33429
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #6) > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #5) > > (In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #4) > > > It's probably time to remove coldfire support from glibc. There's at least > > > one other GCC issue that comes and goes randomly, causing glibc build > > > failures. > > > > > > https://inbox.sourceware.org/libc-alpha/ef5e5579-7b2f-85e5-0b72- > > > [email protected]/ > > > > I uploaded a GCC patch to > > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121941 > > > > which can build glibc with GCC 16. > > I doubt that this works because the current global-dynamic TLS > implementation in glibc uses malloc, and malloc uses TLS. If it's > initial-exec, then there's no recursion. I expect this crashes at run time > if all TLS is global-dynamic. Then we should drop Coldfire support. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
