------- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-09-14 16:26 ------- Hi Bill,
> Not sure why you need simple.o since it is "simple" to compile, Because without it I have to create a compiler and then compile simple.cc. Plus I have to hope that I am using the same set of compiler sources as you and that I have configured the compiler in the same way. > but it and xerces 28 are attached Well the simple.o file appears to be missing, but I had a go at creating one for myself. As a result I have created a workaround patch which *may* work. Please give it a go and see if it helps. I am not familiar with this particular area of the linker though, so this is definitely a workaround not a fix. Cheers Nick -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10629 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
