On 12/20/14 11:58 AM, Aharon Robbins wrote:
> In article <mailman.16494.1419004467.1147.bug-b...@gnu.org>,
> Chet Ramey <chet.ra...@case.edu> wrote:
>> 3. There's not actually a lot of demand to make it available, and few
>> implementations go through the pain (even the standalone GNU printf).
>> The only one I found after a quick non-exhaustive search is the ksh93
>> builtin, which doesn't use the libc printf engine at all.
>
> I assume you mean "shell implementations". :-)
Point taken. I meant utility implementations.
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU c...@case.edu http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/
