Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 07:24:53PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Did you change the preemption model or other processor settings in the
>> kernel?
> Yes, "of course" and "everything" - if something is described as
> "experimental" and looks as if it _might_ be useful, I'll give it a
> try when building an -rc kernel. Usually, those settings get
> carried forward to newer kernels. I was building prerelease kernels
> before I ever came to LFS.
>
> On x86_64 I've got CONFIG_PREEMPT set. For IOSCHED I've
> accidentally picked up CFQ as the default (/me utters rude words
> about systemd), but I've been building NOOP and DEADLINE for years,
> and I'm reasonably sure that one of them was my default when I first
> noticed the problem - it's been a long time, probably about 2 years,
> since big C++ compilations made the desktop unresponsive.
May I suggest that you 'make defconfig' for the kernel just for testing
and see if the results are significantly different.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
