On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 03:10:37AM +0100, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 08:34:42PM -0500, Brendan L wrote:
>
> > Also I was reading some firefox bugs and it looks like they are
> > switching all their Tier 1 platforms to build with clang.
> >
>
> Which was why I tried using clang - as I said, in the beta I used
> last weekend it saved a lot of space in the build, but now it FTBFS
> so whether or not it would save any disk space is irrelevant.
>
> Of course, their version of clang might be different (if so, probably
> older).
The definite difference between my builds and theirs is that I'm
using system libraries. But 63.0b6 was ok with clang{,++} on
BLFS-8.3 and 63.0b8 failed on both that and current -dev plus
llvm-7.0.
--
Tout est bien, tout va bien, tout va pour le mieux qu'il soit possible
-- Candide, de Voltaire
(Everything is for the best, in the best of all possible worlds)
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
