On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 03:35:33PM -0300, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> Em 25-05-2014 15:10, Ken Moffat escreveu:
> > On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 10:32:02PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> >> On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 10:09:14PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> >>> On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 08:01:24AM +0200, Pierre Labastie wrote:
> >>  Realised I could test these while leaving the box to run.  They
> >> both build (no idea if the runtime is acceptable, and I probably
> >> won't be in a position to test that for several days.
> >>
> >>  I'll attach the rediffed patch.
> >>
> >  Also needed for 1.2.4.  The same patch applies, but with fuzz 1 and
> > an enormous offset which causes it to create configure.orig.  I've
> > got a clean version, if wanted.
> > 
> >  The 1.2.4 version seems ok (parole is working), for 0.10 I'm less
> > sure - almost every video at youtube which I try with firefox
> > appears to offer me a flash version, which does not play for me,
> > although one gave me video but no sound.  I then tried opening a
> > local video file from firefox - the video was fine, but again no
> > sound. :-(
> > 
> > ĸen
> > 
> 
> Thanks, ĸen. I don't know. It seems that we need this solution, instead
> of the one in the book. Do you prefer the patches, instead of the sed
> suggested by Bruce? Also, I preferred the solution by Pierre, because
> reading his post, I thought it was better in terms of speed.
> 

 I think that Bruce suggested a sed for lame ?  I'm running with
that, but have not tested it at runtime.  At the moment that box is
having another attempt to backup my windoze system (realised I
needed to remove my recent large HDtracks.com downloads, and from
ntfs3g I only mount windows as r/o - talk about up/down/up/down, I'd
forgotten what a pain that is ;)

 For the gst-base plugins, does "i686-gcc-4.9.0-1.patch" sound like
a decent name ?

> Please, whatever you decide, submit the patches and fix the book, if you
> do not mind.
> 

 OK.
> And please, mark in the ticket that the gst-base, is partially fixed.
> I'm the two versions of FF that you updated behind. No FF in the new dev
> box, only Midori and the one from gnome.
> 
> I am doing something for the book and with a small headache, so would
> prefer not doing it myself.
> 

 Fine, it won't be today, and perhaps not tomorrow.  For headaches I
have no general advice, but best wishes.

ĸen
-- 
das eine Mal als Tragödie, dieses Mal als Farce
-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to