On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 08:01:24AM +0200, Pierre Labastie wrote: > Have you tried Fernando's solution? > (http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/blfs-dev/2014-April/027263.html). > That is for gst-plugins-base, but I guess it may be adapted to lame. > > Pierre
Thanks for the pointers. I thought both of these issues had been addressed by what is currently in the book. For gst-plugins-base I had to apply fernando's patch manually (I think I sorted out the wrapping caused by putting it in the body of the mail, but it did not apply - the block seems to be a few lines earlier in my source, and that was enough for it to be treated as "reversal - apply anyway?" and then fail to apply. I've rediffed it, will test sometime without the existing sed. Not sure if that will be tonight. Will reply separately for lame. ĸen -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, dieses Mal als Farce -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
