Em 24-05-2014 03:13, Pierre Labastie escreveu: > Le 24/05/2014 08:01, Pierre Labastie a écrit : >> Le 24/05/2014 03:12, Ken Moffat a écrit : >>> I haven't built i686 for ages - my last time was while testing 7.4, >>> for 7.5 there was nothing which I felt it would be useful for me to >>> test on that architecture. But all the recent LFS changes made me >>> decide to try it again. The machine is an AMD A4, and LFS itself >>> built ok. >>> >>> But lame, even with >>> sed -i -e 's/fast-math/& -msse2/' configure >>> fails to build : >> >> [...] >>> >>> For the moment I've commented lame out, but I'm sure that >>> something, possibly ffmpeg, will want lame. Any other ideas about >>> fixing the gcc-4.9 problem on 32-bit ? >>> >>> ĸen >>> >> Have you tried Fernando's solution? >> (http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/blfs-dev/2014-April/027263.html). >> That is for gst-plugins-base, but I guess it may be adapted to lame. >> >> Pierre >> > Actually, for lame, one possible solution is in this post: > http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/blfs-dev/2014-April/027260.html > > Pierre >
Please, read also the ticket about LibreOffice: http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/ticket/5042 Since the version in the book, it cannot build with gcc-4.9.0 in i686. This night I tried again, for the first time in the new udev system, and it was the same as in the hybrid LFS. So, we have already lame, gst-plugins-base (both versions) and LibreOffice. Perhaps we could change this thread subject to "Some build problems with gcc-4.9.0: lame, gst-plugins-base and LibreOffice" or something like that. -- []s, Fernando -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
