> I'm speculating, one reason could be that sites are loath to disclose > their exact $ purchase prices etc. But on the other hand for most of > the publicly owned systems this should be accessible information > anyways. I was just thinking that this might be an interesting > parameter to track. I was also curious as to when systems become > larger is there an economy of scale in the Beowulf world? i.e. for > something like Jaguar or Kraken is the $/teraflop much lower than what > it is for my tiny 100-node system. Another question could be: Is it > cheaper to assemble 100 Teraflops of capacity in the US or WU or China
I don't think you'll find that information anywhere readily. Also consider the difference between peak HPL flops rating and the useful work you will get out of a system. Sticking my neck out slightly here, systems with lots of GPUs will score highly on the $$/flop ratings - but do you get that amount of work under real-world loads? John Hearns The contents of this email are confidential and for the exclusive use of the intended recipient. If you receive this email in error you should not copy it, retransmit it, use it or disclose its contents but should return it to the sender immediately and delete your copy. _______________________________________________ Beowulf mailing list, [email protected] sponsored by Penguin Computing To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
